Global With Local Features

The Economic Times     9th November 2021     Save    
QEP Pocket Notes

Context: Due to GoI’s enabling policy framework, investors have reposed faith in India through a record foreign direct investment (FDI) of $81.72 billion (Rs 6.1 lakh crore) in 2020-21.

Shifts in tenets of the global economic regime due to Covid-19 pandemic

  • World is transitioning to a more anomalous setup from the era of the Washington consensus-led market economics,
  • Non-market economics has begun to be a factor in global economic and business decision-making.
  • Geopolitical realities, and usage of concentrated supply chains as a tool of power projection, have prompted business strategies like China plus one’ and bans on social media applications.

Benefits of FDI 

  • Ideological opposition to foreign capital is no longer popular in India: According to CVoter Consumer Tracker ,70% Indian consumers viewing FDI as beneficial to the country, while only about 10% considering it harmful. 
    • Despite anti-China sentiments, Chinese apps and mobile phones are popular in India.
  • Helps break domestic monopolies and leads to a more competitive economy.
  • Role in reviving growth was acknowledged by 82% respondents in CVoter Consumer Tracker. Hence, foreign investors can bank on favourable public opinion for their investments in India.
  • Creation of new economic ecosystem of unicorns: Indian founders of unicorns are success stories in popular Indian perception, even if they sell their company off lock, stock and barrel to a global giant of foreign origin.

Challenges 

  • Support for FDI tempered by a protectionist impulse that seeks to avoid concentration of market power. According to CVoter Consumer Tracker 
    • Only 10% respondents support a laissez-faire investment policy. 
    • Every second consumer in India wants FDI to be ring-fenced by protectionist measures.
    • Almost every third consumer wants FDI to be subject to strict terms and conditions. 
  • Impact of geopolitical rivalries on FDI: Corporations from countries involved in any kind of conflict with India are disliked. Punitive measures announced by GoI against Chinese entities, enjoy popular support.  According to CVoter Consumer Tracker 
    • Almost 90% respondents backed the ban on Chinese apps and social media companies.
    • Almost every third consumer in India is echoing GoI’s anti-China sentiment using a made-in-China instrument.
    • More than two-thirds of Indian consumers believe that a check on Chinese investments cannot hurt Indian interests.
    • 9 out of 10 Indians consider Chinese investments untrustworthy.
  • Impact of sectoral dominance: Support for FDI becomes less when foreign investors dominate a certain sector, e.g., ecommerce. According to CVoter Consumer Tracker
    • Only 27% respondents considered the domination of the ecommerce space by giants like Amazon and Walmart-owned Flipkart as good. 
    • 44% respondents categorised  dominance of Amazon and Walmart-owned Flipkart as negative, while the rest considered it as ‘mixed’.
  • Higher disapproval of  foreign capital dominance in some sectors like defence ,media agriculture and telecom,aviation ,education and consumer goods etc.
  • Support for one entity and unpopularity of the other: US entities enjoy a significant edge over Chinese ones owing to non-market factors of public opinion. 56% respondents in a survey deemed the US trustworthy.

Way forward: Glocal Polibiz

  • Public policy connected with localised perceptions: As in a democratic setup, public perception is everything in the decision-making chair of policy framework. 
  • Businesses will have to factor in wider public perception to transcends their consumer base: Business may be global, but politics remains anchored in the local. The baseline being that FDI in India is welcome, but subject to constraints of popular democracy.

==========================================================================================

QEP Pocket Notes