Context: The Supreme Court recently emphasized that the objectives of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act cannot be overlooked, especially as perpetrators resort to marrying their minor victims to evade punishment, despite the persistence of child marriages.
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.
o Gender neutral: The Act is gender neutral and regards the best interests and welfare of the child as a matter of paramount importance at every stage so as to ensure the healthy physical, emotional, intellectual and social development of the child.
o Child definition: Any person below the age of 18.
o Forms of abuse: It defines different forms of sexual abuse, including penetrative and non-penetrative assault, as well as sexual harassment and pornography, and deems a sexual assault to be “aggravated” under certain circumstances.
o Stringent Punishment: The Act prescribes stringent punishment graded as per the gravity of the offence, with a maximum term of rigorous imprisonment for life, and fine.
o Child pornography: It defines "child pornography" as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a child which include photograph, video, digital or computer-generated image indistinguishable from an actual child, and image created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict a child.
POCSO Rules 2020
o Reporting to be directed to the Special Juvenile Police Unit (SJPU), police, or cybercrime portal.