Left Out Of CoWin

The Indian Express     15th May 2021     Save    
QEP Pocket Notes

Context: Technocratic approach towards vaccination prioritises data collection over vaccine equity. There are privacy concerns too.

Issues with the technocratic approach of vaccination: While the CoWin portal has been launched by the government to digitise the vaccination drive, it is marred with the following issues:

  • Exclusion: Mandatory provision based on age (18-44 years from May 1, in 3rd phase) has a propensity to exclude people who are on the other side of the digital divide as well as for its inherent design issues.
    • According to the Indian Telecom Services Performance Indicator Report for October- December 2020, only 34.60% of the rural population subscribes to the internet.
    • Thus the majority of India’s rural population is being discriminated against, and a form of technical rationing is being implemented by CoWin based on broadband connectivity and digital literacy.
  • Data Protection and cybersecurity: At present, vaccination slots on the portal are being released without any notice or schedule and are being snatched up within seconds.
    • Either through its official API or auto- mated scripts, a range of functionality is available for people to automate functions ranging from notification to even slot reservation.
    • This risks exposure of medical healthcare data through third-party providers.
    • The CoWin website has no privacy policy, even while India lacks a data protection law.
    • This is contrary to the Supreme Court’s right to privacy judgment but also to the departmental guidelines of the Government of India for official websites.
      • The departmental guidelines clearly state that government websites, when collecting personal data, “must incorporate a prominently displayed privacy statement...”.
    • Recently, the government tried to replace the biometric and iris scanning under Aadhar (in order to prevent infections) with face authentication, which still involves privacy risks.
      • Moreover, facial authentication is being piloted in a legal vacuum of a data protection law.
  • Other technical barriers:
    • The use of Aadhar based authentication creates barriers for universalisation of vaccination with a worrying prospect of false-negative results, as it has demonstrated high error rates in the past.
    • Environmental factors, as opposed to ideal laboratory conditions, will further contribute to operational complexity.

Conclusion: The technocratic approach disregards the experience of public healthcare and digital rights experts. The present deployment of CoWin, rather than augmenting the right to health, is undermining it.

QEP Pocket Notes