The Economic Reforms — Looking Back To Look Ahead

THEIASHUB
Get an Instant Call Back from Our Expert Mentors Now!
+91

Context: The 1991 economic reforms have been more focused on the technical nature of the economy than the system, process and people. As a result, quite a few primary drivers of the economy have not got enough recognition.

Limitations of India’s economic growth model since 1991

  • Poor Human Resource Capital (HRC) formation: Due to lack of quality education, low skilled manpower and inadequacies in basic health care.
    • As per Global Human Capital Report, 2017, HRC rank for India stands at 103, Sri Lanka is at 70, China at 34, and South Korea at 27.
  • Low per capita GDP: At $6,997 in PPP terms, India is ranked 125th globally.
  • Low research and development expenditure and weak technology readiness: At 0.8% of GDP, vis-à-vis higher value for other fast emerging economies like South Korea (4.5%), China (2.1%) and Taiwan (3.3%).
  • Low labour productivity: On account of lack of HRC and low technology readiness.
    • Low wages: Hourly wages in India have been $1.7. They are $38, $24, $20.7 and $3.3 for United States, Japan, South Korea, and China, respectively.
    • In India, labour productivity in manufacturing is less than 10% of advanced economies, including Germany and South Korea, and is 40% of China, as reflected in a World Bank publication of 2018, The Future of Manufacturing-Led Development.
  • Inefficient utilisation of economic resources: Difficulties in acquiring land for businesses, efficient utilisation of economic infrastructure, and in providing business services. This increases the time and costs of setting up enterprises.
  • Persisting uncertainties: For years, the economy has been hit internally due to low consumer demand as a result of low household incomes and externally on account of lesser competitiveness and inadequacies in integration with global supply chains for trade.
    • A Business as Usual (BAU) approach is resulting in diminishing returns.


Way forward: The new reforms should be systemic and address structural issues

  • Raising HRC by way of enhanced public sector outlay to 8% of GDP, from current 5%, for education, skill development (including for advanced technologies) and public health.
  • Enhancing public research and development expenditure to 2% of GDP over the next three years.
    • Leverage Industry 4.0, which will be defined by new technologies such as robotics, 3-D printing, artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of things (IoT), etc.
  • Work on strategies to enhance per capita income by more wages for workers through higher skills and enhancing minimum wages, besides improving the social security net.
    • Address issue of the increased cost of labour: To be compensated by higher productivity, tax-benefits in the initial period of wage reforms, besides reducing transaction costs in business and improving infrastructure utilisation efficiency.
  • Systemic approach to institutional reforms: Encompassing inter-connected basic factors of the economic system, for policy reforms to unlock creativity and innovation in the economic system, raise total factor productivity (TFP), or a measure of productive efficiency, and to achieve higher growth.
    • Policy reforms should lay an emphasis on process innovation and promote a business-centric approach to implementing pre-determined service quality levels (SQLs).

QEP Premium 2025 (B5)
QEP Premium 2025 (B5)
Buy now
Fill out form for more details
I agree to give my consent to receive updates through SMS/Email & WhatsApp*.

Prelims Samadhaan + Mentorship 2025
Prelims Samadhaan + Mentorship 2025
Buy now



Join theIAShub’s Mains Answer Writing Program

Refine your answer writing skills and elevate your UPSC preparation with personalized support and expert feedback.

Fill out the form to get started with the program or any other enquiries !

I agree to give my consent to receive updates through SMS/Email & WhatsApp*.