Use Covid-19 to Make a Fairer India

The Economic Times     10th June 2020     Save    
QEP Pocket Notes

Context: Covid-19 has exposed the rising economic inequalities in the world.

Rising Inequalities:

  • Effect of disruptive events: wars, epidemic, and attempts to redistribute wealth exacerbate inequalities.
  • COVID impact: More than 60 million are being pushed into poverty worldwide an on the other side US billionaires like  Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos's wealth is rising in billions.
  • Distinctive reactions:
  • Thinning of the center (middle class) due to their movement towards political extremes
  • Rise in horizontal movements bringing toghether multiple objectives to assert their needs through a few identified leaders.

India’s tryst with inequality :

  • After independence : 
  • State monopoly: C Rajagolachari denigrated governing elites as ‘wooly-headed socialists’.
  • Rampant corruption: black money and special-interest vote banks rose behind the veil of ‘poor friendly’ state.
  • Liberalization: 
  • Hydra of nationalism based on license permit raj and punitive taxation was beheaded after the 1990s to let global salaries and corporate lifestyles become a norm. However, beyond the headlines, disparities continued to rise.

COVID as an opportunity:

  • Invest in equality enhancers:  Through ample ‘COVID fiscal headroom’ and bridging ‘opportunity gaps’.
  • Social infrastructure investment :
  • Increasing investment in healthcare (2-4% of GDP)
  • Improved education (replacing rote-based instructions with application focussed and employment creating education.)
  • Digital availability to every student.
  • Improved Support to the migrants: through widened and rationalised unemployment support, adopting more delivery digital systems and consolidating the plethora of schemes.
  • Provide Relief to the overburdened judiciary: 
  • Judiciary suffers from worthless pleas like renaming India to ‘Bharat’ and other high profile pleas. (Around 60% of jail inmates are undertrials)
  • Through standardization of matters: like bail and automated processes limiting the appeals to be heard in person.
  • Segregation of higher courts: into two streams i.e.  
  1. ‘General’- dealing with regular matters and 
  2. ‘Singular’-dealing with constitutional and socially important cases.
  • Increase the number of judges.
  • Transform Regulators: 
  • Despite having plethora of regulators, we have only few defined service standards to measure their performance.
  • They need to be pro-active: take suo-motu action in a free market economy to protect consumers, small entrepreneurs, and the vulnerable.
  • Provide credit support to vulnerable: 
  • As capital creates an entrepreneurial glass ceiling, MSME support by the governemnt will hopefully support small firms.
  • A credible equity capital pool: created as a sub-allocation under the National Investment and Infrastructure Fund (NIIF).

Conclusion: By helping the vulnerable to overcome inequalities, Gandhiji’s dream of Sarvodaya (universal uplift) through Antyodaya (uplift the most vulnerable) can be achieved. 

QEP Pocket Notes