Not Grounded in Reality

The Economic Times     10th July 2020     Save    

Context: Industry associations have recently approached the Jal Shakti Ministry against National Green Tribunal (NGT) order for providing no objection certificates (NOCs) for groundwater withdrawal.

NGT’s Order 

  • Permission for groundwater withdrawal : must be based on study of availability of groundwater and periodic report on replenishment of groundwater.
  • Flaws in NGT order:
  • Groundwater levels also depend on seasonality, rainfall, digging activity in upstream areas, etc.
  • Unit-specific study before imposing the order: is a time taking process.
  • Economic ramifications: Adversely affecting industries that require groundwater in terms of jobs, incomes and livelihoods. 

Problems in Groundwater Withdrawal Policy

  • Monitoring groundwater withdrawal: usually hidden from public view, and use of pumps can easily extract more than permitted. 
  • Technology-enabled monitoring requires frequent human visits to such units, that allows units to change the system in their favour.
  • Limited capacity of CGWA: i.e inadequacy of technocracy is due to factors like
  • Institutional design fails to meet the challenges of a rapidly degenerating environment and a growing economy.
  • Financial allocations are lower than large monitoring and enforcement capabilities. 
  • Limited responsibilities and accountability assigned to those in the technocratic set-up.

NGT’s Failure

  • Principle of proportionality:  Good groundwater practices by industry are important, but will not solve the groundwater problem.
  • Industry’s share in groundwater extraction is less than 1% of the total.
  • Principle of accountability: NGT order stops operations of large, medium and small units irrespective of their compliance with the law.

Conclusion: A better NGT order would have directed the Ministry and CGWA to be better resourced and more accountable by 

  • Increasing the ability to catch and impose fines on erring units
  • Asking them to study monitoring and enforcement mechanism of other countries
Making decision-makers liable for not creating a good monitoring and enforcement mechanism.