First, Fix a Right Target

The Economic Times     16th August 2020     Save    

Context:  Indian revenue administration’s failure to achieve its budgetary target is reflected in its unrealised tax collections, poor revenue targeting and forecasting.

Implications of Poor Revenue Targeting

  • Fiscal Implications:
    • May lead to Higher expenditure: in anticipation of higher revenues.
    • Higher fiscal deficit: as a result of exceeding expenditure over revenues.
  • Non-fiscal Implications:
    • Gives rise to detrimental practices:
      • Due to pressure at the end of the financial year, tax officers raise unfair demands and take coercive action to realize the targeted revenue.  
    • Delayed tax refunds: simply because the department does not want to report a lower figure of net collections.

Reasons behind Failed Revenue Targeting

  • Highly skewed top-down exercise : setting a revenue target with hardly any consultations with field formations.
      • Finance ministries estimated fiscal deficit is communicated to two revenue boards as their targets for the year.
      • Revenue boards (CBDT and CBIC) allocate the targets given to them to their chief commissioners who, in turn, further allocate them to the field formations. 
  • Unrealistic budget targeting: At the micro-level, officers often find that the budget communicated to them is highly unrealistic.
  • Expecting a fixed percentage of increase in tax over the earlier year’s collection is unrealistic and fails to factor in the variation in tax rates.

Way Forward

  • Bottom-up approach: where supervisory officers listen to their subordinates and correct any underestimation of projected revenue.
    • The top-level (Ministry) could compare the estimates presented to it by the lower level (Chief commissioners) with its own requirements(of tax-GDP ratio) and act accordingly.
  • Fix realistic targets: for the department and encourage it to collect revenue strictly as per the law.
  • Reintroduce principles of Management By Objectives (MBO): ensuring participative management in the functioning of the tax department.
  • Pushing Systemic tax reform: by income tax department through induction of technology in its day-to-day functioning.