Context: Analysing consequences of COVID 2.0 on India’s foreign policy canvas.
Consequences on COVID 2.0 on India’s foreign policy
Demise of regional primacy: India’s regional aspirations of transforming from a balancing power to a leading power taken a halt as the pandemic prompted India to accept foreign aid after a gap of 17 years.
As a result, South Asian states are likely to board the Chinese bandwagon.
Uncertainties regarding Quad: Post pandemic, there are doubts on India’s ability and desire to contribute to Indo-Pacific and the Quad.
It will limit ambitious military spending or modernisation plans and the country’s attention on global diplomacy and regional geopolitics, be it Afghanistan or Sri Lanka or the Indo-Paci?c.
Domestic politics and shifting priorities: General economic distress, a fall in foreign direct investment and industrial production, and a rise in unemployment have already lowered mood.
Upcoming elections and political compulsions further limit scope for any foreign policy innovations.
A shift in India-China equations: India might be forced to be more conciliatory towards China because of the following -
A stronger China: China has, compared to most other countries, emerged stronger in the wake of the pandemic. World, notwithstanding anti-China rhetoric, will continue to do business with China.
Unsure of the nature of China-U.S. relations: Rise of China and India’s COVID-19-related troubles could prompt Washington to hedge its bets on Beijing.
Fading Indian claims: That India could compete with China as a global investment and manufacturing destination would remain as claims.
Depressed foreign policy: There is a scope for more accommodation, reconciliation and cooperation in neighbourhood with Pakistan and other SAARC members.
A forced moderation in approach: As the United States seemed hesitant, at least initially, to assist India, whereas Russia, China and even Pakistan reached the forefront, offering helps.
Pressure on strategic autonomy: Counter pressures as a post-COVID-19 New Delhi might find it harder to resist demands of a closer military relationship with the U.S.
Conclusion: Every crisis opens up the possibility for change and new thinking.
Opening up new regional opportunities for cooperation, especially under the ambit of SAARC, an initiative that already saw some small beginnings during the first wave.
Focus on ‘regional health multilateralism’: To promote mutual assistance and joint action on health emergencies such as this.