Governor’s power as Chancellor

Governor’s power as Chancellor: The Governor’s role as Chancellor of State universities is inherited from British colonial rule, not mandated by the Constitution, and often politicised, undermining university autonomy.

• About the historical background: Initially set up by the British in 1857, the Governor was appointed as Chancellor to maintain control over universities in Calcutta, Bombay, and Madras. This model continued post-Independence.
• Dual Role of Governor: Governors exercise two roles: acting on ministerial advice (Article 163) as Governor and independently as Chancellor, often bypassing State government advice on university matters.
• Governor vs. President: The President, as Visitor of Central universities, consults with the Ministry of Education, while Governors act unilaterally for State universities, lacking legislative oversight.

• Governance Issues: Governors’ unchecked power in State universities creates administrative paralysis, delays Vice-Chancellor appointments, and undermines university autonomy.
• Academic Incompetence: Many Governors lack academic qualifications, relying on opaque advice, leading to poor decision-making.
• Federalism Concerns: The Governor’s central role in State universities undermines federalism, as universities should be accountable to elected State governments.
• Commissions’ Recommendations:

o Rajamannar Committee (1969-71): Suggested Governors perform functions as Chancellor on the advice of the State government.

o Sarkaria Commission (1983-88): Recommended consultation with Chief Ministers while maintaining independent judgment.

o M.M. Punchhi Commission (2007-10): Advocated for the Governor to focus on constitutional duties and proposed eminent academics as Chancellors.

o Venkatachaliah Commission (2000-02): Recommended political neutrality and a supportive role for Chancellors.