Context: The ways in which the police have enforced the lockdown have invoked both admiration and scorn.
Positive shades
Creating awareness: Officers in Chennai and Hyderabad have been using helmets resembling the virus.
Tackling fake and misinformation: Police units in Assam and Maharashtra have used social media in innovative ways to escalate the cyber cell.
Relief Efforts: In Assam, Punjab, Karnataka and Maharashtra, the police have been distributing food, hand sanitisers and other essentials to the poor.
Community engagement: by roping in NGOs and other organisations into relief works.
Negative Shades
Excessive harassment :
Trust deficit: Through assault and lathi charge and reports of destruction of essential commodities.
The continuance of such a modus operandi has the risk of retaliation from the public,
Callousness rooted in sub-culture: their sense of commitment to the rule of law is overpowered by a value system of police sub-culture which demands them to be ‘tough’.
Justification of highhandedness:
Exceptional circumstances: generating stressful conditions due to lockdown.
Overworked police force:
As much as 90% of the official work for more than 8 hours a day (The Economist, 2014).
Only 144 police officers per 1,00,000 citizens, against 222 recommended by the UN.
Lack of cooperation from the public: due to paranoia associated with the virus has resulted in instances of violence against the police officers by the public.
Erroneous perception: Individual police indulging in unlawful behavior brings disrepute and loss of credibility to the police as a organization.
Ambiguous laws: MHA guidelines which on one hand allow police to be quick in responses and on the other states were uncertain, such flexibility decreases their accountability.
Way Forward:
Compassionate leadership: to be able to take an effective managerial and supervisory role
Public Cooperation: Partnership with other stakeholders must be scaled up through community policing which will increase the trust and lower the burden of police.