Schism in Global Community on Defining Terror

The Tribune     17th December 2020     Save    
QEP Pocket Notes

Context: Counter-terrorism challenges in present times have become more and more complicated. There is a  need to have greater policy collaboration among member states to define what constitutes terrorism

Multilateral Body’s Discourse on Defining Terrorism

  • United Nations General Assembly (UNGA): since 1996, recommending a working group for finalising process on draft comprehensive convention on international terrorism (still work in progress with no concrete results).
  • UN Security Council Resolution 1373: provided normative and actionable steps for combating terrorism, without giving globally accepted definition of terrorism.

Issues associated with defining Terrorism

  • Distinction between ‘terrorism’ and ‘legitimate rights of people to resist foreign occupation’ was observed by Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and international law.
    • U.S. objected to this distinction on account of its operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.
  • Differences further widened due to geopolitical rivalries: between US-China and Iran-US cold war dictated the discourse (in 2020).
    • Counter-terrorism measures not as means for stifling human rights or a fundamental freedom was observed by US drawing attention to China’s actions in Xinjiang province.
    • In turn, China urged against “the use of double standards and interference in affairs of other countries under the guise of combating terrorism”.
  • US’s unilateral listing of Iran as “the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism”: was objected by Iran and it called for streamlining UNSC’s listing and delisting procedures.
    • 14 ongoing sanction regimes support political settlement of conflicts, nuclear non-proliferation, and counterterrorism.
  • Israel underlined need for comprehensive convention on international terrorism: with zero tolerance approach to terrorism that no cause or grievance could or should ever justify or excuse terrorism.

Conclusion:

  • Hiring moderators, filtration mechanisms of tech giants (Facebook and Twitter) are inadequate in dealing with counter terrorism challenges such as online radicalisation.
  • Hence it’s time for enhanced accountability, coherence and greater policy collaboration among UNGA member states and implementation of international legal provisions on prevention, repression and elimination of terrorism.
QEP Pocket Notes