When Helping Hurts

The Indian Express     22nd August 2020     Save    

Context: Raising the legal age of marriage for women to 21 years needs to reconsider its disproportionate impact on marginalised rural communities.

Trends in Early Marriages: National Family Health Survey (NHFS)-4 data 2015-16.

  • Rural-Urban Relationship: Rural women are likely to marry earlier than their urban counterparts
  • Linked with Economic Status:
    • Higher wealth quintile leads to a delayed marriage of women
    • Poorest households are concentrated in rural India
  • Causal link with education levels
    • Women with 12 years or more of schooling are most likely to marry later.
    • Early marriages are not the main reason for school dropouts among women, and other reasons are responsible like:
      • Loss of interest in studies, the prohibitive cost of education, the burden of household work, and schools located far away.
      • Only 8% of rural girls who drop out in the age group 6 to 17 years cite marriage as the reason.
    • Stress on access and quality of education is backed by a report of the apex child right’s body, National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, and the NGO Young Lives,
      • For, E.g. between 2005-06 and 2015-16, child marriage in 15-19 age group for girls has decreased from 26.5% to 11.9%

Factors Affecting Early Marriage in Marginalised Communities

  • Socio-economic necessities: of vulnerable communities force the early marriage of women
    • Poor Scheduled Tribes (ST) (45%) and Scheduled Castes (SC)(25.9%) girls marry earlier than the general category women (9%).
  • Lack of access to education: results in rising instances of early marriage, especially among vulnerable class like
    • A large percentage of SC (33%) and ST (44%) women have received no schooling as per NFHS-4 data.
    • Small percentage of SC (10%) and ST (15%) women have completed 12-plus years of education as compared to other category women.
    • Presently, children in the age group of 14-18 are outside the purview of the Right To Education Act and most likely to drop out. 
  • Varying minimum age marriage for girls and boys: in several personal laws and also in Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (PCMA), 2006 (i.e. 18 years for girls and 21 for boys).
    •  The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act: increased the age of consent, from 16 years to 18 years.

Negative Implications of Increasing the Legal Age of Marriage 

  • It will add to these existing hurdles for young women’s access to reproductive and sexual healthcare. 
  •  SC-ST households with least recourse to legal and other safeguards, at a greater risk.
    • It will end up criminalising and exacerbating the existing vulnerabilities of SC and ST women.

Way Forward

  • Important Commissions’ Recommendations: 
    • Bring uniformity in the age of marriage at 18 years for both men and women- 18th Law Commission report (2008).
    • Lower the age of consent to 16 years.- Justice Verma Committee
  • Address the gendered and caste-based disparities instead of implementing a blanket law devoid of social justice principles.
  • Extend the right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 18 years for tackling the issue of child/early marriage.

Conclusion: Efforts to address child marriage should be in consonance with the socio-economic realities that demand investment in education, welfare, and opportunities for women.

Other related articles

The logic of, and debate around minimum age of marriage for women

There is no reason why minimum age of marriage for women should be lower than that for men