Time for India and Nepal to Make Up

The Hindu     19th August 2020     Save    
QEP Pocket Notes

Context: There is a need to restore India Nepal relations through proper diplomatic channels to resolve the border dispute.

Challenges in India- Nepal Relations:

  • The difference in Border Claims:
    • Nepal’s Claim is centred around the Treaty of Sugauli (1815): No agreement has superseded that treaty, so no subsequent cartographic machinery can undermine the 1815 document.
    • Areas of Tensions: ownership of the triangle north of Kumaon, including
      • The Limpiyadhura ridgeline,
      • The high pass into Tibet at Lipu Lek, and 
      • The Kalapani area hosting an Indian Army garrison.
  • Misconstrued Quiet Diplomacy of Nepal: As per the Nepali diplomats, it preferred quiet diplomacy and that Kalapani had never been off the table since talks began in the early 1980s.
  • Since a joint communiqué issued in 1997, the two governments have agreed that a territorial dispute exists on upstream Kali and have assigned negotiators.
  • Democracy in Nepal: With the advent of democracy in Nepal after 1990, the demand for evacuation of Kalapani gained momentum. 
  • Recent developments that triggered the tensions:
  • India published its new political map in November pressurising  Nepal to put out its map incorporating the Limpiyadhura finger. 
  • Nepal introduced a constitutional amendment to certify the new map.

Way Forward: 

  • Focussing on backchannel diplomacy between the two capitals, which helped in ending the 2015 blockade. 
  • Recognising the Friendship and geopolitical significance of Nepal:
    • Nepal responded with sensitivity towards India before and after the India-China war in 1962 and did not publicly demand its withdrawal.
    • Nepal, along with Bhutan, acts as the strategic buffer against the rising hegemon i.e. China. 
  • Immediate de-escalation: It requires verbal restraint on the part of Prime Minister Oli and India’s willingness to talk even as the pandemic continues. 
  • India needs to maintain the status quo in the disputed area by halting construction on the Lipu Lek track.
  • Reactivate Talks: With the help of the video conference facility between the two Foreign Secretaries.
  • Encouraging Public Commitments: The formal negotiations should begin with ab initio public commitment by both sides to redraw their respective maps according to the negotiated settlement.
  • Build a Limpiyadhura Zone of Peace and Pilgrimage: The area should be de-militarised and irrespective of the outcomes of the agreement, should be declared a zone pf peace open for all.
QEP Pocket Notes