Context: Money financing is a viable route to take us back to pre-COVID-19 levels of output.
Issues with public spending:
Greater public spending will increase the fiscal deficit and this expansion has to be financed.
Theoretically, it can be financed by higher taxes.
But when the economy is in a recession, this option cannot be explored even though the balanced-budget multiplier is one.
When the multiplier is one, output expands by the same amount as the increase in government spending.
Issues related to borrowing from the World Bank and IMF:
Paying back in hard currency: This would involve India having to earn hard currency by stepping up exports.
If a stimulus of approximately 10% of the GDP is envisaged, with exports at 25% of the GDP, it would imply stepping up exports by close to 50%.
This would be a herculean task under present circumstances.
Issue of conditionalities: It is not obvious what conditionalities will come along with the loan.
Delay in negotiation: The loan is bound to take some time to be negotiated, taxing the energies of a government that ought to be engaged in the day to day battle with COVID-19.
The external debt is truly national which, arguably, government bonds held by the country’s private sector are not.
Way Forward:
Money financing: Economic argument against money financing is that it is inflationary.
However, whether a fiscal expansion is inflationary or not is related more to the state of the economy than the medium of its financing.
When resources are unemployed, the output may be expected to expand without inflation.
We need to explore the option of money financing to take India back to pre-COVID-19 levels of output and employment.