Context: India needs empowered cities to nurture elected mayors for top political jobs.
Arguments favouring empowerment of cities:
Urban Tax Potential: The Economic Survey (2017-18) has estimated house tax potential at Rs 42,160 crore for rural areas and Rs 23,184 crore for urban areas.
It suggested property tax rates of zero for houses with one room, 0.1% for two rooms, 0.2% for three, four and five rooms, and 0.3% for six and above rooms.
Constitutional obligations: under 73rd and 74th Amendment Act.
India’s Constitution mandates the appointment of Finance Commissions (FCs) every five years to recommend how central government revenue should be shared with the states.
FCs have started recommending a share of revenue as grants to local bodies, rural and urban.
The share of urban bodies in devolved funds has risen from 0.78% (11th FC) to 4.3% (in 15th FC).
Engines of future development: Since the World Bank says 55% of India’s population can be considered urban, decentralisation should focus more on municipalities than rural panchayats.
Nurturing elected mayors: A good model for this would be Indonesia’s president, Joko Widodo.
Issues specific to city administration:
Top-down political system: In a first-past-the-post electoral system, few talented new faces can gain enough critical mass to win elections. (Indian political parties tend to represent family dynasties)
Flawed definition of Census towns: India has ‘villages’ of 10,000 people, while other countries have ‘towns’ with under 1,000 people.
Downsides of unconditional grants by FC: Unconditional grants induce local bodies to abolish or reduce their own taxes so that the aim of increasing local body funds is foiled.
The 15th FC recommends a mix of unconditional grants and those linked to national priorities like drinking water, water harvesting and sanitation.
Absence of State Finance Commissions: The 15th FC has castigated many states for not appointing state finance commissions (SFCs) to devolve powers and revenue to local bodies.
Many states have not done so because state-level politicians want to monopolise funds.
Poorly managed: without devolution of funds, administrative and tax powers, many municipalities are superseded by state governments, while others are obliged to follow state-level bureaucracy.
Low Property Tax:due to vested interests; In many countries, property tax can be 1% or more of market value. In India, it is often 1/100th of this.
Ways to empower Indian cities
Grants should be matching grants (those linked to local revenue collection): instead of unconditional transfers devised by 15th FC.
Property tax collected by cities can be matched by additional grants from central revenue, resistance from vested interest can be overcome.
Serious reform of property taxes: Based on suggestions of Economic Survey 2017-18
Property tax rates of zero for houses with one room, 0.1% for two rooms, 0.2% for three, four and five rooms, and 0.3% for six and above rooms.