Context: In today’s extraordinary circumstances the Parliament should convene soon with adoption IT solutions that will make it even easier.
Reasons for more active Parliamentary Action
Central role in governance and accountability: It checks and challenges the government of the day.
The Constitution Drafting Committee preferred a Parliamentary System to ensure the accountability of governments at all times.
Premier Law-Making body: an appropriate act with suitable checks and an expiry date could have been brought to enforce lockdown, rather than making decisions under the Disaster Management Act, 2005.
Scrutinize Expenditure: Measures to address the economic crisis announced by the government should have been subjected to scrutiny or approval.
Raising concerns: MPs have a duty to shape policy and guide the government in the national interest.
Questions related to issues arising out of pandemic must be addressed
Constitutional Provisions: remote meetings with physical distancing is not prohibited.
Article 85: President may summon Parliament “to meet at such time and place as he thinks fit”.
The Rules of Procedure of both Houses: The Speaker may permit meetings to be held outside.
Use of technology: There is no issue of confidentiality with the regular meeting as they are regularly telecasted.
Committee meetings may require remote working tools.
International Examples: The Inter-Parliamentary Union has documented the processes used by various national parliaments to meet during the pandemic.
The British Parliament has adopted a hybrid model of in-person and video attendance.
Way Forward
Parliamentarians are the sentinels of the people and should find a way to perform their constitutional duties by harnessing the country’s IT strengths.