Legislation To Legalize Same-Sex Marriages Is Abysmally Overdue

Livemint     23rd June 2021     Save    
QEP Pocket Notes

Context: Denying individuals matrimonial and other rights that emanate from matrimony solely for their sexual orientation is unjust.

Same-sex marriage legal position in India

  • In Navtej Singh Johar vs Union of India case 2018, the SC decriminalized homosexuality.
  • In Shakti Vahini case, 2018, SC observed it would be impossible to think of dignity in its hallowed wholeness if freedom to “express one’s own choices” is impeded.
    • Right to marry a person of one’s choice thus been included as an inherent part of Article 21.
  • The Uttaranchal high court in Madhubala vs. State case upheld the live-in relationship of a same-sex couple but observed that partners could not enter wedlock.
  • Legal void: Thus, India does not consider same-sex marriages ‘illegal’ per se, but there are no laws relating to marriage that explicitly authorize same-sex unions.

Need for legalizing same sex marriages:

  • Human rights perspective: Denial of matrimonial and other civil rights that emanate from association of marriage to individuals based solely on their sexual orientation is a grave injustice.
  • Upholding fundamental right: One’s decision to marry a person of one’s choice is essentially a part of an individual’s freedom and thus a fundamental right.
  • Merely decriminalizing homosexuality is ineffective: As it failed to provide homosexual partners with the right to marry and does not give same-sex couples a sense of recognition and belonging in society
  • Along global trend: The Netherlands was the first country to legalize same-sex marriage in 2000, followed by other countries, and now a total of 29 countries have recognized same-sex marriages.

Challenges in bringing in same-sex marriage legislation

  • Against religious sentiments of society: As in Islam, homosexuality is typically considered a sin; in Christianity, it is usually condemned, and Hinduism, although relatively lenient, tends to portray marriage as a procreative institution.
  • Restricts legal reforms: As legal principles are often drawn along the lines of religious and moral sentiments of a country’s majority.
    • Thus, same-sex marriage laws cannot emanate from existing personal laws but from secular, individualistic laws which are socially in the backfoot.

Way forward: Legal reforms to accord same-sex unions legal sanction and social acceptance

  • Comprehensive legal framework conferring partners rights of succession and maintenance, economic, adoption and pension rights and protection against domestic violence.
  • The onus of this lies on the legislature, as the judiciary can only direct the government to take appropriate measures for justice.
QEP Pocket Notes