The seductiveness of borders

Business Standard     27th June 2020     Save    
QEP Pocket Notes

Context: Borders are made sacrosanct through the various distinct socio-cultural, political and territorial aspects around the world. However, history teaches that borders are derived from realities and not autonomous facts.

Various dimensions of borders: Borders have been malleable and thus have been molded accordingly.

  • Cultural and religious significance
        • The vedic period was restricted to northern India. Post-Vedic empires stretched further east to Bihar.
        • Adi Shankaracharya traveled to all corners of the “country” to establish places of devotional learning in the ninth century.
        • Free movement was ensured between different rules: For E.g. Pallavas in the south and Gurjara-Pratihara in the north facilitated the movement of Adi Shankaracharya.
  • Political Significance: 
        • The idea of the nation state: led to the personification of India as Bharatmata.
  • Pre-Independence British political changes:
  • Assam came within the national boundary in 1826 after the Indo-Burmese war in 1824.
  • Darjeeling was leased from Sikkim (became a part of India in 1975) Chogyal in 1835 for setting up a sanatorium, 
  • Kalimpong and the Dooars became part of Darjeeling after battle with Bhutan in 1865.
  • Post-Independence:
  • Unilateral Claims by India: Nehru ordered to print new maps showing all of Aksai Chin as Indian territory, while the Chinese had no better historical claim.
    • Geographical dimension: Tawang tract in the Arunachal Pradesh fell south of the McMahon Lime only because of a convenient deviation from the watershed principle.
    • Changing frontiers Around the world:
      • Effect of World Wars: Europe, Italy and Germany did not exist as geographical entities till the second half of the 19th Century. Rise of the US and fall of the Soviet remarked several boundaries.
      • Impact of Imperialism: Borders in West Asia and Africa have been arbitrarily drawn to suit the interests of imperialists.
  • Set off long term conflicts between neighbors— For.E.g. the Kurds and the Pakhtoons.
      • Change continued: in the 21st Century
  • The Russian takeover of the Crimean Peninsula.
  • States in Caucasus fighting over enclaves.
  • China’s conversion of atolls in the South China Sea into military bases.

India’s Failure in dealing with border issues: 

    • Avoiding the conflict: 
      • India has been avoiding the conflict over territory by “making borders irrelevant”.
      • The institutional restraint on aggression is weakening and unalloyed/autonomous powers are at play.
QEP Pocket Notes