The maxim of the fish

Business Standard     8th June 2020     Save    

Context: The recent changes in the definition of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in India presents us with both opportunities and challenges.

Contribution of MSMEs (before changes):

    • Share in GDP: 25% 
    • Export share: 45% of India’s total exports. 
    • Employment: About 120 million workers 

Changed definitions:

  • Conceptual level changes
    • Done away with different yardsticks for service units and manufacturing units. 
    • The yardstick for manufacturing and services units would now be both the turnover and the level of investment in plants and machinery.
    • New composite criteria: for both manufacturing and Service units
  • Micro Units: Rs 1 crore of investment and Rs 5 crore of turnover.
  • Small Units: Rs 10 crore of investment and Rs 50 crore of turnover
  • Medium Units: Rs 50 crore of investment and Rs 250 crore of turnover. 
    • Increased beneficiaries: Almost 99% of India’s registered companies and 70% of all listed entities in the country would be able to enjoy announced MSME benefits.
Challenges:
    • Not globally competitive: India’s MSMEs would be nowhere near the ones in developed countries like Germany or South Korea (their investment limits are much higher than the revised Indian definition)
    • Unrealized Cooperation: between Indian MSMEs and those from Germany or Korea due to large investment and turnover gaps.
    • Quality compromised: due to the removal of provision of global tender for procurement which will deny the government benefits of global competition. 
    • Matsya-Nyaya (big fxish eating up small fish): Smaller among the medium enterprises will now have to struggle harder to face tougher competition from new and larger companies. 
Conclusion:  Measures taken should help Indian MSMEs in exploiting the new opportunities. However, there might be protests from micro and small units demanding more relief after being threatened by the larger units.