Context: The recent clamor over boycotting Chinese imports in India is a futile exercise and will hurt itself. Careful aiming of actions is required.
Issues with India’s trade
Massive Economic stature of China:
India accounts for only 3% of China’s total exports of about $2.5 trillion.
Huge foreign exchange reserves of about $3 trillion.
Costly indigenous production: India had virtually stopped manufacturing even the most ordinary goods, and even if it is made, are costly, ending up with consumers paying more.
India’s dependence on China: Risks of disruption along the supply chains due to no ready substitutions.
Market dominance of China in certain products like strategic materials.
Sourcing from alternative suppliers would be costly.
Futility of free trade argument:
Britain became a free trader only in the 19th Century when it established a clear lead in the Industrial Revolution.
The US, once the champion of free trade, is now shifting positions.
India as a soft state : has been vulnerable to special interests.
This will lead to India becoming a high-cost economy and more uncompetitive manufacturing.
Seeking trade parity: with every partner is not feasible and should be avoided.
Way Forward:
Import substitution: Many other countries have successfully managed by ensuring temporary tariff support and reducing with time; those who failed would shut down- ensuring market discipline.
Maintain overall balance: loss in merchandise trade could be gained through services; as long as the balance is neutralized by capital inflows.
Restrict China’s Access: to strategic markets like telecom (prone to spyware mischief), product segment (with poor quality, For E.g. thermal power plant equipment).
In pharmaceuticals or software services, where China is doing the same for Indian exports.