OBC Sub-Categorisation is Caught Up in Bad Politics

Business Standard     22nd July 2020     Save    

Context: Despite being a good idea, Justice Rohini Commission for the sub-categorization of the Other Backward Classes (OBC) is caught up in bad politics due to its prolonged extension.

Rationale for the creation of Justice Rohini Commission

  • Defining the OBC: OBC in not a social community, it is rather a legal administrative nomenclature that puts together a wide range of disparate social groups.
  • 1st group: There are powerful landowning farming communities like Jats, Yadavs, Kurmis in the Hindi heartland, Vokkaligas in Karnataka, and Kunbis in Maharashtra.
  • 2nd group: Comprises a large number of numerically small peasant and allied communities such as fish-workers and herdsmen who have little or no landholdings.
  • 3rd group: includes artisanal communities like weavers, blacksmiths, carpenters, and those engaged in handicrafts.
  • 4th group: are the traditional “service” communities — barbers, washermen, entertainers, and so on.
  • 5th group: includes nomadic communities or groups traditionally engaged in socially stigmatized occupations like begging, stealing, or crime.
  • Bewildering Diversity: 
  • The official OBC list includes groups that are only a couple of steps behind the upper castes, and also castes and communities that are worse off than some Dalit communities.
  • Disproportionate distribution of benefits:  
  • After 3 decades of implementation of Mandal Commission which clubbed together all diverse groups, disproportionately large share of jobs has gone to well off communities within.
  • Sub-categorisation is a simple way to split 27% reservation quota ensuring the welfare of the most backward communities.
  • Supporting Legal and Political precedents:  
  • The Supreme Court had explicitly endorsed this idea in the famous Indra Sawhney judgment
  • At least nine states are already using sub-quotas for the OBCs in government jobs,

Way Forward:

  • Appropriate to classify each caste group at the state level: because the socio-educational condition of the same caste varies from state to state and absence of a caste census.
  • Insistence on the informed public debate: rather than using the matter as a political tool to gain legitimacy and popularity.