Facebook’s Accountability

Business Standard     18th August 2020     Save    
QEP Pocket Notes

Context: The social media platform is in the eye of a political storm over alleged violations of its own anti-hate norms. This episode underlines the need for state regulation of such online apps.

Issues with social media in checking hate speeches:

  • The changing role of social media: While most social media platforms started as a facilitator of conversation and deepening democracy, it has now become a self-directed arbitrator.
      • For E.g. The Wall Street Journal recently reported the reluctance shown by Facebook in checking hate speeches communicated through its platform.
  • Excessive Penetration: WhatsApp has over 400 million users in India and their usage can be assumed to reflect the diversity of their views and preferences.
  • Self-regulation not satisfactory: Developing trust in the social media firms to self-regulate without any accountability is a flawed proposition and has failed in the past concerning advertisements.
  • Non-deterrent legislation: Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code, which penalizes hate speeches, doesn’t act as an effective deterrent.

Way Forward: 

  • Devising effective legislation: to hate speeches perpetrated with the help of social media platforms and making them accountable.
  • Create a balance between free speech and restrictions: 
  • Politicians might also be encouraged to demand a closer say in how social media platforms manage content.
      • Facebook should publish its India- specific guidelines on moderation for public examination.
QEP Pocket Notes