Context:The recommendation of the Kris Gopalakrishnan committee on Non-Personal Data (NPD) usage needs a relook since it is marred with various issues.
Suggestions of the Committee regarding NPD usage
Setting up a regulator: With the powers to request data, supervise data-sharing requests, and settle disputes.
NPD regime should favour Indian companies: This is consistent with India’s refusal to sign a G- 20 treaty allowing cross-border data access and data-sharing between nations.
NPD categorization: into three classes:
The first is public data collected by the government like census data, health ministry records, and municipal records.
The second is community NPD, For E.g. electricity consumption in a locality or eating habits in a neighborhood, would also include telecom services data.
The third category is anonymized sensitive personal NPD such as may be collected by a hospital.
Data Anonymization: In all cases, data will be anonymized with personal identifiers removed.
Obligation of the companies:
Companies collecting NPD should register with the government and make data mandatorily available after anonymization.
Also disclose how the data is collected and store it devoid of personal details.
Creating economic opportunities: $ 500 billion opportunities in the next five years is predicted by selling of the anonymized data to the private entities.
Issues with committee’s suggestions:
NPD can be easily de-anonymized:
For E.g. data collected form food delivery businesses, relating to eating habits of an area can be de-anonymized if tied to electoral rolls and telecom records.
The government already has vast amount of personal data which can be easily linked to the anonymized data.
Commercial issues
Severely impacts business model: If the data collected by the government is made to sell to the rival businesses, it will create caution among the investors thus impacting investments.
Intellectual Property Eroded: Mandatory revelation of the method of data collection and anonymization impacts innovation
No precedence available: Such a system of mandatory data collection and nationalized data warehousing doesn’t exist anywhere