Context: Continued rise in the number of cases even after a nationwide lockdown presents a moment to consider the positives and negatives of the government in handling the crisis.
POSITIVES:
Quick and Serious Interventions:
Even before international flights were shut down, there were temperature checks and attempts at social distancing at airports.
Other populist-nationalists worldwide took much longer in understanding the gravity of the situation, For E.g. President Bolsonaro of Brazil.
Risking a proper lockdown to control spread: backed by huge public support.
Indians are by and large willing to sacrifice a great deal if the prime minister tells them it is necessary.
This can be equated with the public support towards demonetization.
Recognizing the crisis as a public health crisis before an economic one:
It is an economic crisis because it is a public health crisis and not the other way around.
Thus, economic packages have been of the form of relief and liquidity provision, rather than a demand stimulus.
NEGATIVES:
Inefficient and Ineffective management of the flow of goods and people:
Movement of poor migrants helped in carrying the virus from the containment zones to other areas, thus rapidly increasing the spread.
No clarity about the local and state borders and lockdowns has hit the economy.
The Union has failed in its Constitutional responsibility to manage inter-state trade and commerce.
Insufficient scaling up of testing:
Actual tests conducted are well below the installed capacity, which itself is a fraction of the potential capacity.
Tests have been conducted more intensively in areas, such as South Delhi, where the virus may not have progressed as much as in others like Northeast Delhi.
Replacing the testing standard from RT-PCR to less reliable antigen assays:
This coincided with the flattening of Delhi curve, which often fails to detect cases.
Officials are searching for various absurd metrics — “recovery rate”, “positivity rate” — to try and spin a spreading pandemic as a success.
Continuation of petty politics even during the crisis:
Mass defection during the period.
Harassing the states led by the opposition.
This has generated an impulse to divide rather than unite against the crisis.